Strange results from ‘test convolution’

[Delta-mike]

I have followed all the steps in order, but when I test convolution the frequency response has not changed.

I have Mitch’s book, and followed the both of the online guides. I have tried many (20) different excess phase and other changes and it’s always the same result.

My target curve is fine. I really can’t understand what I’m doing wrong.

Very grateful for any help! Thanks, Dion

[Delta-mike]

Measurement:

[Delta-mike]

Here are my screen grabs

[Delta-mike]

And my result after testing the convolution and applying smoothing

[Delta-mike]

After correction

[Ecwl]

I am a bit confused. Usually when you run Macro 5, the test convolution result is called Test1 & Test 2. But I see that in your display, they’re called Pulse96Lmp and Pulse96Rmp but those are usually the files you get after prefilter+original measurement+smoothing.
Moreover, if you’re to save the test convolution result (corrected frequency response), and you want to apply psychoacoustic smoothing to it, you have to empty curves 3-6 whereas your screen capture leaves the curves 3-6 intact from Macro 5.
I wonder if you just loaded the wrong files to be displayed.

As a total aside, I always think 6/6 and pre-ringing 2 as way too aggressive. I’m surprised you don’t have group delay above 100Hz (or maybe you do and was going to work on it after you figured the test convolution part out).

[UliBru]

The pictures show a working samplerate of 48000 but Pulses with samplerate 96000. This does not make sense.
And yes, the pictures do not show the test convolution result. Usually the result is displayed unsmoothed. If you like to apply macro1 on the test pulses you have to switch the workspace to subfolder \Testconvolution and run macro1 once again